ODYSSEY EAST: Alirocumab efficacy and safety vs ezetimibe in high cardiovascular risk patients with hypercholesterolemia and on maximally tolerated statin in China, India, and Thailand.

Department of Cardiology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China. Electronic address: hanyaling@263.net. Department of Cardiology, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong, China. Department of Cardiology, Medanta - The Medicity, Delhi, India. Department of Cardiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China. Institute of Translational Medicine, Jinan Central Hospital, Jinan, China. Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. Division of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China. Department of Cardiology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China. Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Union Medical Center, Tianjin, China. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China. Department of Cardiac Surgery, Ruijin Hospital of Shanghai, Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai Hospital, Chiang Mai, Thailand. Clinical Development, R&D, Sanofi, Montpellier, France. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Tarrytown, NY, USA. R&D, Sanofi, China.

Journal of clinical lipidology. 2020;(1):98-108.e8
Full text from:

Abstract

BACKGROUND The proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor alirocumab significantly reduces low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). OBJECTIVE This study (ODYSSEY EAST) assessed the efficacy and safety of alirocumab vs ezetimibe in high cardiovascular risk patients from Asia. METHODS Patients (n = 615) from China, India, and Thailand with hypercholesterolemia at high cardiovascular risk on maximally tolerated statin were randomized (2:1) to alirocumab (75 mg every 2 weeks [Q2W]; with dose increase to 150 mg Q2W at week 12 if week 8 LDL-C was >1.81 mmol/L [>70 mg/dL]) or ezetimibe (10 mg daily) for 24 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was percentage change in calculated LDL-C from baseline to week 24. Safety was assessed throughout. RESULTS Baseline data were similar in both groups. LDL-C levels were reduced from baseline to week 24 by 56.0% and 20.3% in the alirocumab and ezetimibe groups, respectively (P < .0001 vs ezetimibe). Overall, 18.8% of alirocumab-treated patients received a dose increase to 150 mg Q2W. At week 24, 85.1% of alirocumab-treated and 40.5% of ezetimibe-treated patients reached LDL-C <1.81 mmol/L (<70 mg/dL, P < .0001 vs ezetimibe). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 68.5% of alirocumab-treated and 63.1% of ezetimibe-treated patients, with upper respiratory tract infection the most common (alirocumab: 13.3%; ezetimibe: 14.1%). Injection-site reactions occurred more frequently in alirocumab-treated patients (2.7%) than in ezetimibe-treated patients (1.0%). CONCLUSIONS Alirocumab significantly reduced LDL-C vs ezetimibe in high cardiovascular risk patients from Asia and was generally well tolerated. These findings are consistent with previous ODYSSEY studies.

Methodological quality

Publication Type : Pragmatic Clinical Trial

Metadata

MeSH terms : Cholesterol, LDL